PDF
ZENODO
Published
2025-10-26
Section
Articles
How to Cite
How to Cite
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF “HIBBAT UL-HAQOYIQ” AND “QUTADGHU BILIG”
Dostonbek Qo‘ziqurbonov
Trainee Lecturer, Namangan State University
Abstract
Annotation. This article provides a comparative analysis of Ahmad Yugnaki’s Hibbat ul-haqoyiq and Yusuf Khass Hajib’s Qutadghu Bilig, focusing on their philosophical, ethical, and literary connections. Both works are considered major sources of moral and didactic thought in Turkic literature. Employing comparative, historical, and philosophical methods, the study reveals their common and distinct aspects based on the ideas of knowledge, justice, and perfection. The findings shed light on the evolution of didactic thinking in Turkic literature.
References
1.Bertels, E. E. (1960). Introduction to the History of Turkic Literature. Moscow.
2.Sodiqov, M. (1998). The Philosophical Foundations of Qutadghu Bilig. Tashkent: Fan.
3.Hojiahmedov, M. (2004). Ahmad Yugnaki and His Work. Tashkent: Ma’naviyat.
4.Karimov, N. (2010). Yusuf Khass Hajib and His Era. Tashkent: Sharq.
5.Rasulov, A. (2015). Turkic Ethical Works and Their Specific Features. Samarkand: SamSU Press.
6.Rustamov, Kh. (2020). Didactic Traditions in Medieval Turkic Literature. Bukhara: BSU Press.
7.Alimov, S. (2022). Sources of the Ideas of Knowledge and Justice. Tashkent: University Press.
