Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology

CIVIL-LAW PROTECTION OF GREEN BIOTECHNOLOGY IN UZBEKISTAN

Sardor Sh. Mamanazarov

PhD in Law, Associate Professor Head, Department of English Law and European Union Law Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords: green biotechnology; genetically modified organisms; plant breeders' rights; precision breeding; transgenic contamination; civil liability; biotechnology legislation; Uzbekistan.

---

Abstract

Green biotechnology is central to Uzbekistan’s agricultural modernisation agenda, yet the civil-law framework governing it remains fragmented and internally inconsistent. This article examines Uzbekistan’s existing legislation — including the Civil Code, the Law on Selection Achievements, the Law on Organic Products (2022), and relevant presidential decrees — and identifies four structural problems. First, the absence of dedicated biotechnology legislation forces reliance on general civil-law rules not designed for self-replicating biological subject matter. Second, a direct conflict exists between Presidential Decree PQ-4899 (2020), which promotes genetic engineering, and the Law on Organic Products, which prohibits GMO use in organic production, with no mechanism to allocate liability where transgenic gene flow damages certified organic farms. Third, gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9 fall outside current patentability criteria, creating investment uncertainty. Fourth, mandatory GMO labelling is absent. Drawing on comparative analysis of EU, U.S., and other countries, the article proposes a comprehensive Biotechnology Act, a strict-liability regime for transgenic contamination, mandatory environmental insurance, and GMO labelling rules.

---

References

Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/576/

Confédération paysanne and Others v. Premier ministre, Case C-528/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:583 (Court of Justice of the European Union, Grand Chamber, 25 July 2018).

Contreras, J. L. (2019). The intellectual property dimensions of agricultural biotechnology: An empirical review. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 22(1–2), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12110

Correa, C. M. (2000). Intellectual property rights, the WTO and developing countries: The TRIPS Agreement and policy options. Zed Books.

Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/447/303/

Drahos, P. (2010). The global governance of knowledge: Patent offices and their clients. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760013

European Commission. (2003). Commission Recommendation 2003/556/EC on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Official Journal of the European Union, L 189, 36–47.

European Union. (1998). Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 213, 13–21.

European Union. (2003). Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European Union, L 268, 1–23.

European Union. (2003). Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms. Official Journal of the European Union, L 268, 24–28.

European Union. (2004). Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. Official Journal of the European Union, L 143, 56–75.

European Union. (2004). Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Official Journal of the European Union, L 157, 45–86.

European Union. (2014). Guidelines on Technology Transfer Agreements (2014/C 89/03). Official Journal of the European Union, C 89, 3–50.

Falck-Zepeda, J. B., Traxler, G., & Nelson, R. G. (2000). Surplus distribution from the introduction of a biotechnology innovation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(2), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00028

Heller, M. A., & Eisenberg, R. S. (1998). Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280(5364), 698–701. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.698

Holman, C. M. (2012). Developments in synthetic biology are altering the IP landscape for biotechnology. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 14(1), 51–100.

Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLOS ONE, 9(11), e111629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111629

McKinsey Global Institute. (2020). The bio revolution: Innovations transforming economies, societies, and our lives. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/life-sciences/our-insights/the-bio-revolution

Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser, 2004 SCC 34, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 902 (Supreme Court of Canada).

OECD. (2005). A framework for biotechnology statistics. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264010437-en

Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. (2001). Guide to US regulation of genetically modified food and agricultural biotechnology products. Pew Charitable Trusts.

Qaim, M. (2020). Role of new plant breeding technologies for food security and sustainable agricultural development. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 42(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13044

Rimmer, M. (2015). Beyond the genome: Intellectual property and the next generation of biotechnologies. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781951262

Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press.

Stasi, A., & Biryukova, O. V. (2016). Regulatory frameworks for GM crops: An institutional approach. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(3), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9614-8

Zaynobiddinova, F. (2021). Specific features of investment contracts and issues of improving their civil-legal regulation [Abstract of doctoral dissertation (PhD)]. Tashkent State University of Law.

Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (1996). https://lex.uz/docs/111181

Republic of Uzbekistan Law on Inventions, Utility Models and Industrial Designs (1994, as amended 2024). https://lex.uz/docs/107785

Republic of Uzbekistan Law on Selection Achievements (1996, as amended 2002). https://lex.uz/docs/107953

Republic of Uzbekistan Law on Organic Products, O'RQ-766 (2022). https://lex.uz/docs/5978476

Presidential Decree of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-4899 on Comprehensive Measures for Developing Biotechnologies and Improving the Biological Security System (25 November 2020). https://lex.uz/docs/5095218

Presidential Decree of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-158 on the Uzbekistan-2030 Development Strategy (11 September 2023). https://lex.uz/docs/6600364

Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan Resolution No. 535 on Approving the Regulation on the Procedure for Determining Compensation Payable to the Patent Holder for Unauthorised Use of an Invention, Utility Model or Industrial Design (31 August 2024). https://lex.uz/docs/7226881