PDF
ZENODO
Published
2026-02-01
Section
Articles
How to Cite
How to Cite
LINGUOCULTURAL AND STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC FEATURES OF UZBEK AND ENGLISH TOPONYMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TERMEZ AND WINCHESTER PLACE NAMES
Komila Shoyimova
Termez University of Economics and Service, Termez, Uzbekistan
Keywords: toponymy, linguoculturology, comparative linguistics, Termez, Winchester, oikonym, urbanonym, semantic motivation, cultural code
Abstract
Toponyms function not only as geographical labels but also as linguocultural signs that preserve historical memory, collective identity, and semantic values of a speech community. This study provides a comparative analysis of Uzbek and English place names (toponyms) through the case of Termez (Uzbekistan) and Winchester (England). The research aims to identify structural-semantic patterns, etymological layers, and linguocultural meanings embedded in urban toponymic objects such as oikonyms, urbanonyms, hydronyms, and institutional names. Using descriptive, comparative, and linguocultural analytical methods, the study examines how language, culture, and history interact in the formation and functioning of toponyms. The findings reveal both universal and culture-specific tendencies: while English toponymy often exhibits morphologically transparent compound structures (e.g., Winchester), Uzbek toponymy reflects historical multilingual contact, metaphorical nomination, and culturally marked semantic motivation. The article argues that comparative toponymic studies offer a productive framework for understanding linguistic worldview differences and cultural conceptualizations across languages.
References
1. Mills, A. D. (2011). A Dictionary of British Place-Names. Oxford University Press.
2. Room, A. (2006). Placenames of the World. McFarland.
3. Tent, J., & Blair, D. (2011). Motivations for naming: The development of a toponymic typology for Australian placenames. Names, 59(2), 67–89.
4. Kadmon, N. (2000). Toponymy: The Lore, Laws and Language of Geographical Names. Vantage Press.
5. Crystal, D. (2019). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
6. Nash, J. (2015). Toponymy and identity: Place names as heritage. Journal of Cultural Geography, 32(1), 1–17.
7. Azimov, A. (2018). Linguocultural features of Uzbek place names. Philological Studies, 12(3), 44–52.
8. Rahmatov, T. (1973). O‘zbek toponimiyasi masalalari. Toshkent: Fan.
9. Begimov, O. T. (1999). O‘zbek onomastikasi va toponimika. Toshkent: Universitet.
