THE LINGUO-COGNITIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE “PERSONALITY” CONCEPT IN KOREAN AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Elmuratova Umida

THE LINGUO-COGNITIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE “PERSONALITY” CONCEPT IN KOREAN AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Elmuratova Umida

Independent Researcher (PhD) Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages Samarkand, Uzbekistan

##semicolon## cognitology, concept, conceptosphere, culture, thinking, compara tivistics, personality, linguo-cognitive analysis, cultural schema.

सार

In this article, the linguo-cognitive interpretation of the concept of “person (인간)” is analyzed on a broad scale through a linguopoetic approach. The concept of person is explained as a cognitive unit directly connected with human thinking, national worldview, and cultural values, and several issues are identified in understanding lexical - semantic, phraseological, and stylistic means during linguo poetic analysis. The study scientifically substantiates the necessity of analyzing the national-cultural characteristics of the concept of person, its linguopoetic means of expression, as well as its ethical and spiritual layers based on Uzbek and Korean literary works. Such an approach demonstrates, from the perspective of cognitive linguistics, the intrinsic connection between language, thought, and culture in the concept of person. The article conducts research using conceptual analysis, comparative-linguopoetic, and cognitive-semantic methods. As a result, the concept of person is interpreted as a central semantic unit that represents an individual’s personal and social essence, moral values, and national identity. In Uzbek and Korean literary texts, this concept is expressed through metaphorical and emotional means characteristic of the national mentality, worldview, and system of values. At the same time, the analysis of Korean literary works enables students to extract the main ideas, understand different semantic layers, and, when comparatively studying them with Uzbek literary works, more deeply comprehend their semantic and aesthetic dimensions.

##submission.citations##

1. Babushkin, A. P. (1996). Types of concepts in the lexico-phraseological semantics of the language. Voronezh.

2. Boldyrev, N. N. (2000). Cognitive semantics: A course of lectures. Tambov.

3. Choi, W. (Choi Won-young). (2018). The linguistic structure of cognition through cultural schema. Korean Cognitive Linguistics Journal, 26(1), 101–120.

4. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.

5. Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.

6. Umida, E. (2025). KIM SAKKAT VA MUQIMIY ASARLARIDA SATIRANING QIYOSI. TA’LIM, TARBIYA VA INNOVATSIYALAR JURNALI, 2(2), 156-159.

7. Elmuratova, U., & Eshonqulova, Z. (2022). KOREYS VA O 'ZBEK QADIMGI XALQ OG 'ZAKI IJODIDA MUSHTARAKLIK. Ta'lim fanlari bo'yicha akademik tadqiqotlar , 3 (6), 489-493.

8. Mamatqulova, K. A., Amanullayeva, K. M., & qizi Shuhratova, V. J. Considerations for teaching Japanese literature. International journal of health sciences, 6(S7), 377-385.

9. Назирова, Х. (2019). Художественная интерпретация чайной церемонии в японской литературе (на примере романа Ясунари Кавабата «Тысячекрылый журавль»). Восточный факел, 4(4), 57-69.

10. Маматқулова, Х. А. (2022). Этномаданий Маъноларнинг Бадиий Матнда Ифодаси. Kresna Social Science and Humanities Research, 4, 30-33.

11. Sattorova, G. (2020). Features fantasy Kenzaburo Oe. Результаты научных исследований в условиях пандемии (COVID-19), 1(03), 57-60.